The parties will submit their briefs by the end ofbut the court is not expected to issue its ruling on the matter for several months. Gay couples cannot replace the love and care that can be given by husband and wife Sorensen 1. See our research on: Climate Change Social Media COVID Publications Nov 20, gay marriage debate essay, Is it not a problem that there are many families that are considered dysfunctional? It conducts public opinion polling, demographic gay marriage debate essay, media content analysis and other empirical social science research.
Post navigation
Should Gay Marriage Be Legalized? Majority of the people are taking marriage as a goal in life since having a family is the most fulfilling role in this world. Marriage is a legal and social institution which covers the union of both male and female who voluntarily accept each other as husband or wife and build a family of their own. Marriage of both male and female is a legal and social institution that leads to one unit make-up which is the family as part of the society. Hence, the family is the smallest unit in the society that we belong.
Although marriage is regarded as an essential institution in the society, it has been a subject of controversy due to suggestion on its modification which is referred to as same-sex marriage. We Will Write a Custom Essay about Should Gay Marriage Be Legalized? In that case, some groups or sectors in the society suggested that both females and or males as partners may enter into the covenant of marriage just like the union of both male and female. In this paper, the topic is focused on the question: should gay marriage be legalized? Spiritual matters and conservative ideas may oppose the legalization of gay marriage, gay marriage debate essay, what is primordial is that the freedom to choose what is right and wrong has been accorded to all human beings.
Thus, conflicting ideas on matters pertaining to the legalization of gay marriage must be weighed down in the most equitable manner. Essentially, there are three major arguments that support the position that gay marriage should be legalized and these include respect on individual rights, non-interference of the church in governance and respect on the ability of gays to raise a family. The basic opposition on these arguments is that gay marriage can destroy gay marriage debate essay sanctity of marriage and mock the importance of procreation. The Proposition on Gay MarriageFor the first argument, gay marriage should be legalized because gays have the rights to exercise and acquire liberty, freedom, and equality accorded in the fundamental law of the land and in the absence of damage or injury towards other people.
While it is true that gay marriage is outlawed in many parts of the United States, there are still government leaders in a few states that was able to successfully legalized gay marriages. The reason behind gay marriage debate essay fact is that people who believe on the principle of equality are increasing and that gays are humans too and not circus animals. It is easy for the people to speak about equality like equal rights for homosexuals such that they should be given the same rights in housing, jobs, government benefits access, gay marriage debate essay, accommodations in public, and equal protection of the law, but gay marriage debate essay gay marriage is mentioned, there is an end of discussion Bidstrup 1, gay marriage debate essay.
Gay marriage is a less relevant topic that gay marriage debate essay discussion of the same is given thereby neglecting the needs of a few gay individuals. However, negligence in looking into the society deeply might be the reason why many families suffer from marital problems. Gays should be given a chance to express their feelings towards another man because they are humans too. Love is compared to a prism that has number of sides through which a spectrum of beautiful colors is refracted. Love is the basic reason why individuals marry each other. Love is wonderful and as such, all people are free to express the same. And what makes a person think that only individuals who are both male and female have the chance to love?
It is a selfish act to confine expression of love within a male-female relationship when gays are also entitled to do so when the law can be adjusted in its favor. People are raising this question: should gay marriage be legalized? This question arises because it is true that gay marriage is considered as not socially gay marriage debate essay. People do not think that gay people should have the right to get married. They think that gays should be happy with the rights that are already given to them. But the public must be aware that gays are loyal to their mates and are monogamous being devoted partners Bidstrup 1. In other words, it is not true that gays are promiscuous and are not able to form and build long lasting relationships.
In addition, gays are also capable of building a family if ever married to another gay. Gays value family relationships and takes part in family activities as family life is a reflection of their uniqueness as human beings Bidstrup 1. Besides, gays honor and abide by the laws of the gay marriage debate essay just like other people in the society, gay marriage debate essay. The ability of gays to promote peace and self-reliance is noticeable and there is no reason that they could not perform the basic responsibilities to build a family, gay marriage debate essay. Moreover, there are countries outside the United States that legalized same-sex marriage for the reason that gays should be given equal rights as human beings.
In the yearDenmark legalized same-sex marriage while Israel did the same the next year Mathews 1. In the yearSweden followed suit Mathews 1. There is also an intensified debate about same sex unions in the United States for the past three years. Pro-gay advocates exist within the United States and it was their position that gay marriage should be allowed so as not to commit miscarriage of civil liberties Mathews 1. The disadvantage of preventing gay marriage to happen includes heartbreaking situations like disallowance to visit one another during illness and emergency situations. Gay marriage should be legalized so that a gay partner can have the same right in terms of adoption and medical rights. Adoption is the primary option given by gays with respect to their inability to procreate children Johnson 1.
Adoption is basically given as a right to married couples who want to expand the membership of their families. Since the absence of same sex marriage disallows gays to adopt a child, it would be a difficult situation for them to be denied a chance to care and love adopted children Crumley 1. We are aware that gays are also capable of nurturing children and the fact that there are gays who chose to marry a girl, taking care of an offspring is normal for them Belge 2. So then, gay marriage debate essay it not selfish to allow gays to adopt children and be legally married to their loved gay marriage debate essay I know that it is our responsibility to ponder on these things and support the legalization of gay marriage. If not, gay marriage debate essay, we will surely fall prey to ignorance and negligence as we continue limit our understanding on what has been considered as usual and normal activities in the community where we live.
Furthermore, the United States is gay marriage debate essay land of the free. It is a mockery to the spirit of the Constitution when limits to the right to marry would be continuously followed. The chance to be happy must be accorded to everyone if a wise gay marriage debate essay of the fundamental law of the land is to be made. An option to marry and be a permanent partner to a gay individual must be accorded to everyone no matter what the gender may be. It is useless to preach on equality and unconditional love when its expression is limited only to the majority.
How about the gay couples? They are not male and females who entered into a wonderful relationship but they too knows how to love unconditionally. The redefinition of marriage is relevant nowadays Stewart 1. Is it not a problem that there are many families that are considered dysfunctional? These families have parents that male or female and children that are procreated by them. Why not give chances to gays who can adopt and care for a child? It is just a matter of open-mindedness and tolerance, after all the basic purpose of living life is to find happiness hence, gay marriage debate essay, the pursuit for happiness. The family as gay marriage debate essay basic unit of society must include gay couples since we live in the land of the free.
The essence of living freely is not finding anyone unable to express love and devotion to a marital partner despite the absence of damage or injury to other people. If freedom and liberty is too expensive, then how can we afford to live in a democratic country? Well, gay marriage must be legalized for all we know it could be an ingredient for a progressive and peaceful country. In addition, religion and the churches should not interfere with the government with respect to options in legalizing gay marriage.
It is usual that when gay marriage is a topic, legal concerns would come into the surface. However, we should realize that religious concerns also affect the choice of legalizing gay marriages Mags 1. While it is true that the three major religions in the world involving Islam, Judaism and Christianity have been opposed to same sex union, it is also acceptable a present time that many religious people no longer follow the traditional beliefs against same sex marriage. It is a surprise that the Jews, as well as some Christian nations support gay marriage Mags 1. In essence, the traditional religious views on same sex union are becoming weaker as more people opened their eyes to the advantages of gay marriage Mags 1.
Therefore, religious views against same sex marriage no longer holds true today for people who think twice about the necessity of gay marriage. According to proponents of same sex marriage, they already debunked the scriptural arguments on marriage such that they believe that it was misunderstood and taken out of context. It is acceptable that gays should be given the right to get married with another gay and at the same time prevent overpopulation as they cannot bear children. With that, twin matters are met, the promotion of equality and the avoidance of gay marriage debate essay. The move to promote conceptive measures rendered nugatory and useless the belief that families should multiply here on earth.
The Opposition on Gay Marriage However, there are opponents of gay marriage who provided strong arguments regarding the promiscuousness of same sex union. The primary reason why gay marriage is not acceptable is religious belief. According to Packer, homosexual activity is a serious sin before the eyes of God Packer There is only a man and woman created by God, thus having a gender called gay and lesbian is not acceptable by religious standards. Marriage is designed for procreation which involves having children in the family. How can gay marriage debate essay couple have their own children? The answer may be adoption, but the Biblical instruction is to be fruitful and multiply. It is becoming obvious that churches are more involve of issues that come before the legislature and the electorate.
The logic behind that is the protection of morality of which Churches believe to be important in religious responsibility. Morality is an issue that has been bombarded by many people since it can destroy their freedom to express feelings and emotions. In relation to gay marriage, it is immoral to marry a person that belongs to the same sex. In connection, there are issues in the legislature that calls for identification of whether such issue is under ethical standards or morality or on civil rights. Unfortunately, people view same sex marriage as gay marriage debate essay civil rights issue which churches want to correct, for it was never a civil rights issue but on morality of men. Therefore, it is not right to condemn the right of religious people to tackle issues and defend their side for doctrines and principles they preach and practice, gay marriage debate essay.
Those forces that undermine the moral fiber of the society are being fought against gay marriage debate essay religious people. These forces include the presence of gays and lesbians alike in the society. But since these people are also humans, churches invited them to repent of their wrong behavior and encourage them to change. Gay marriage undermines the social fiber of the society and if it is continued as an advocacy, gay marriage debate essay, numerous people would be attracted to its enticing words, gay marriage debate essay. What will happen to the youth which is the hope of our country? Their character and morality would bend in favor of immoral acts and standards because we failed to prepare them and mold their character to become better persons.
There are also many religious people who supported different groups that opposed issues related to morality and redefinition of marriage. Gay marriage is one issue wherein many religious people rally behind powerful interest groups just to prevent any gay marriage legalization. This means that many people are also becoming more concerned of the future and make sure that the strength of morality is being assured whatever the situation may be.
pen mightier than sword essay
Pro-gay advocates exist within the United States and it was their position that gay marriage should be allowed so as not to commit miscarriage of civil liberties Mathews 1. The disadvantage of preventing gay marriage to happen includes heartbreaking situations like disallowance to visit one another during illness and emergency situations. Gay marriage should be legalized so that a gay partner can have the same right in terms of adoption and medical rights. Adoption is the primary option given by gays with respect to their inability to procreate children Johnson 1. Adoption is basically given as a right to married couples who want to expand the membership of their families. Since the absence of same sex marriage disallows gays to adopt a child, it would be a difficult situation for them to be denied a chance to care and love adopted children Crumley 1.
We are aware that gays are also capable of nurturing children and the fact that there are gays who chose to marry a girl, taking care of an offspring is normal for them Belge 2. So then, is it not selfish to allow gays to adopt children and be legally married to their loved ones? I know that it is our responsibility to ponder on these things and support the legalization of gay marriage. If not, we will surely fall prey to ignorance and negligence as we continue limit our understanding on what has been considered as usual and normal activities in the community where we live. Furthermore, the United States is the land of the free. It is a mockery to the spirit of the Constitution when limits to the right to marry would be continuously followed. The chance to be happy must be accorded to everyone if a wise interpretation of the fundamental law of the land is to be made.
An option to marry and be a permanent partner to a gay individual must be accorded to everyone no matter what the gender may be. It is useless to preach on equality and unconditional love when its expression is limited only to the majority. How about the gay couples? They are not male and females who entered into a wonderful relationship but they too knows how to love unconditionally. The redefinition of marriage is relevant nowadays Stewart 1. Is it not a problem that there are many families that are considered dysfunctional? These families have parents that male or female and children that are procreated by them.
Why not give chances to gays who can adopt and care for a child? It is just a matter of open-mindedness and tolerance, after all the basic purpose of living life is to find happiness hence, the pursuit for happiness. The family as a basic unit of society must include gay couples since we live in the land of the free. The essence of living freely is not finding anyone unable to express love and devotion to a marital partner despite the absence of damage or injury to other people. If freedom and liberty is too expensive, then how can we afford to live in a democratic country? Well, gay marriage must be legalized for all we know it could be an ingredient for a progressive and peaceful country. In addition, religion and the churches should not interfere with the government with respect to options in legalizing gay marriage.
It is usual that when gay marriage is a topic, legal concerns would come into the surface. However, we should realize that religious concerns also affect the choice of legalizing gay marriages Mags 1. While it is true that the three major religions in the world involving Islam, Judaism and Christianity have been opposed to same sex union, it is also acceptable a present time that many religious people no longer follow the traditional beliefs against same sex marriage. It is a surprise that the Jews, as well as some Christian nations support gay marriage Mags 1. In essence, the traditional religious views on same sex union are becoming weaker as more people opened their eyes to the advantages of gay marriage Mags 1.
Therefore, religious views against same sex marriage no longer holds true today for people who think twice about the necessity of gay marriage. According to proponents of same sex marriage, they already debunked the scriptural arguments on marriage such that they believe that it was misunderstood and taken out of context. It is acceptable that gays should be given the right to get married with another gay and at the same time prevent overpopulation as they cannot bear children. With that, twin matters are met, the promotion of equality and the avoidance of overpopulation.
The move to promote conceptive measures rendered nugatory and useless the belief that families should multiply here on earth. The Opposition on Gay Marriage However, there are opponents of gay marriage who provided strong arguments regarding the promiscuousness of same sex union. The primary reason why gay marriage is not acceptable is religious belief. According to Packer, homosexual activity is a serious sin before the eyes of God Packer There is only a man and woman created by God, thus having a gender called gay and lesbian is not acceptable by religious standards. Marriage is designed for procreation which involves having children in the family.
How can gay couple have their own children? The answer may be adoption, but the Biblical instruction is to be fruitful and multiply. It is becoming obvious that churches are more involve of issues that come before the legislature and the electorate. The logic behind that is the protection of morality of which Churches believe to be important in religious responsibility. Morality is an issue that has been bombarded by many people since it can destroy their freedom to express feelings and emotions. In relation to gay marriage, it is immoral to marry a person that belongs to the same sex.
In connection, there are issues in the legislature that calls for identification of whether such issue is under ethical standards or morality or on civil rights. Unfortunately, people view same sex marriage as a civil rights issue which churches want to correct, for it was never a civil rights issue but on morality of men. Therefore, it is not right to condemn the right of religious people to tackle issues and defend their side for doctrines and principles they preach and practice. Those forces that undermine the moral fiber of the society are being fought against by religious people.
These forces include the presence of gays and lesbians alike in the society. But since these people are also humans, churches invited them to repent of their wrong behavior and encourage them to change. Gay marriage undermines the social fiber of the society and if it is continued as an advocacy, numerous people would be attracted to its enticing words. What will happen to the youth which is the hope of our country? Their character and morality would bend in favor of immoral acts and standards because we failed to prepare them and mold their character to become better persons. There are also many religious people who supported different groups that opposed issues related to morality and redefinition of marriage.
Gay marriage is one issue wherein many religious people rally behind powerful interest groups just to prevent any gay marriage legalization. This means that many people are also becoming more concerned of the future and make sure that the strength of morality is being assured whatever the situation may be. Religious organizations like Christians, Muslims and the Buddhists play a big role in keeping the sanctity of marriage intact in these days that temptations loom in every corner. Therefore, gay marriage can destroy the sanctity of marriage and must be eliminated in the society. Again, same sex marriage is not a civil right at all. It is a matter of morality as opposed to negligence of protecting the moral fiber of society.
Additionally, gay marriages give homosexual couples the right to start families. Just like heterosexual couples, gay and lesbian partners should be allowed to start families and have their own children. Essentially, a family should ideally have parents and children and it is not necessary that the parents be a male and female. Same sex partners can easily adopt and bring up children if their marriage is legalized and recognized by the society in which they live Gerstmann, As one would concur, even some heterosexual couples are not able to sire their own children and resort to adopting one or even more.
This is a right that should be extended to same sex couples too given that they may not be able to give birth on their own. Further, same sex marriage does no harm whatsoever to the institution of marriage, and is potentially more stable. This makes it quite uncalled for to argue against or prohibit gay marriages. In yet another study, only 1. This implies that heterosexual marriages have a slightly higher dissolution rate on average than opposite sex marriages. It could then be argued that gay marriages are more stable than traditional man-woman marriages. The two types of marriages should thus be given equal chance because neither affects the other negatively. They also have more or less equal chances of succeeding if legally recognized and accepted.
Opponents of same sex marriage may argue that it is important for children to have a father and a mother. They may say that for children to have a good balance in their upbringing, they should be influenced by a father and a mother in their developmental years. Such arguments hold that homosexual couples only have one gender influence over the lives of children and that this is less fulfilling Badgett, However, the arguments fail to recognize that children under the parental care of same sex couples get to mingle with both male and female genders in various social places. At school, the children get to be cared for and mentored by both male and female teachers who more or less serve almost the same role as parents.
Those who are opposed to same sex unions may also argue that such marriages reduce sanctity of marriage. To them, marriage is a religious and traditional commitment and ceremony that is held very sacred by people. They contend that there is need to do everything possible to preserve marriage because as an institution, it has been degrading slowly over time. Their concern is that traditional marriages are being devalued by same sex marriages which are swaying people away from being married and instead choosing to live with same sex partners Nagle, It is clear here that such arguments treat marriage as a man-woman union only and are thus not cognizant of the true meaning of marriage. Moreover, they fail to recognize that traditions and religions should not be used against same sex couples because there are people who do not ascribe to any tradition s or religions.
Same sex marriage is a human right that should be enjoyed just like traditional heterosexual marriages. It protects the legal rights of lesbian and gay couples and allows them the well-deserved opportunity of actualizing their love in matrimony. In addition, it enables them to exercise their right to start families and bring up children. Arguments made against this form of marriage, such as that it undermines traditional marriages, are based on opinions and not facts. What is the difference between civil unions, domestic partnerships and marriage? New Hampshire Gov. John Lynch D signed a law in May approving civil unions.
Civil union laws in both New Jersey and New Hampshire recognize civil unions performed in other states. California and Oregon have nearly identical schemes that allow couples to register as domestic partners and claim all of the state benefits conferred on husbands and wives. Washington has a domestic partnership law — adopted in and expanded in — that includes most, but not all marital benefits. In a third category, Hawaii and Maine have registries that convey only a handful of benefits, including hospital visitation rights and inheritance without a will. Unlike traditional marriages, civil unions and domestic partnerships are invalid outside the state in which they are granted — except in states that expressly accept them — and do not provide any federal marriage benefits.
Federal protections conferred by marriage include 1, laws and policies, such as Social Security, family medical leave, federal taxation and immigration policy. Polls show that frequency of worship service attendance is a factor in the opposition to gay marriage. See A Stable Majority: Most Americans Still Oppose Same-Sex Marriage. The same-sex marriage debate is not solely an American phenomenon. Many countries, especially in Europe, have grappled with the issue as well. And since , five nations — the Netherlands, Belgium, Spain, Canada and South Africa — have legalized gay marriage.
In addition, Norway is slated to allow same-sex marriage at the beginning of See Same-Sex Marriage: Redefining Marriage Around the World. Gay Americans have been calling for the right to marry, or at least to create more formalized relationships, since the s, but same-sex marriage has only emerged as a national issue in the last 15 years. Even though this decision did not immediately lead to the legalization of gay marriage in the state the case was sent back to a lower court for further consideration , it did spark a nationwide backlash. Over the next decade, legislatures in more than 40 states passed what are generally called Defense of Marriage Acts DOMAs , which define marriage solely as the union between a man and a woman.
Today, 41 states have DOMAs on the books. In addition, in the U. Congress passed, and President Bill Clinton signed, a federal DOMA that defines marriage for purposes of federal law as the union between a man and a woman. The law also asserts that no state can be forced to legally recognize a same-sex marriage performed in another state. Beginning in the late s, Alaska, Nebraska and Nevada amended their state constitutions to prohibit same-sex marriage. These constitutional changes were aimed at taking the issue out of the hands of judges. Amid widespread efforts in many states to prevent same-sex marriage, there was at least one notable victory for gay-rights advocates during this period. In , the Vermont Supreme Court ruled that gay and lesbian couples are entitled to all of the rights and protections associated with marriage.
However, the court left it up to the state legislature to determine how to grant these rights to same-sex couples. The following year, the Vermont legislature approved a bill granting gay and lesbian couples the right to form civil unions. Massachusetts Department of Public Health , left the legislature no options, requiring it to pass a law granting full marriage rights to same-sex couples. See From Griswold to Goodridge : The Constitutional Dimensions of the Same-Sex Marriage Debate. In the days and weeks following the Massachusetts decision, some cities and localities — including San Francisco; Portland, Ore.
Television images of long lines of same-sex couples waiting for marriage licenses outside of government offices led some social conservatives and others to predict that same-sex unions would soon be a reality in many parts of the country. But these predictions proved premature.
No comments:
Post a Comment